Hollywood Whitepaper: AI Filmmaking and Layer 2 Jobs
Introduction
ACT 3 is built around a single core belief:
AI can create entirely new jobs, not just automate existing ones.
We call these “Layer 2 Jobs.”
They are careers that only exist because of AI — new forms of creative self-employment that were not economically or operationally possible before.
Most public discussion about AI focuses on “Layer 1 Jobs” — how existing roles will need fewer people as AI increases efficiency.
The blind spot is that new categories of work can emerge for:
- Experienced professionals who are currently underemployed
- People between jobs
- Career switchers
- New graduates
- Creators who cannot find a role that matches their passion, income needs, or creative goals
For these people, building a self-owned AI filmmaking career can be a viable path to meaningful income, creative control, and long-term leverage.
This whitepaper is the written companion to the ACT 3 Hollywood AI movie.
It is also paired with a spreadsheet-based economic model that makes the business mechanics explicit and testable.
The primary audience is indie AI filmmakers building self-employment.
The secondary audience is studios and companies adapting AI film economics internally.
The Economic Model (Spreadsheet-Driven Planning)
ACT 3 uses a spreadsheet-first approach to economic clarity.
The model is structured into three parts:
-
Founder Income Target
- How much money you want to make per year
- How many movies you need to produce
- What profit per movie is required
-
Per-Movie Economics
- Production expenses
- Marketing costs
- Revenue per release
- Revenue taper over time
-
Per-Year Output Planning
- Number of movies produced per year
- How revenue accumulates across releases
- How older films continue producing lower ongoing revenue
The purpose of the spreadsheet is not precision forecasting.
It is to:
- Force clarity about assumptions
- Make tradeoffs visible
- Show how budget and output connect
- Create a concrete planning framework for self-employment
Users are encouraged to:
- Make a copy of the spreadsheet
- Enter their own numbers
- Adjust assumptions
- Use it as a living planning document
Target Yearly Salary Framework
ACT 3 frames filmmaking as a deliberate income design problem.
Key principles:
-
Target Revenue Per Founder
- Designed around one or two full-time founders
- Founders own most or all equity
- Revenue goals are set per founder, not per project
-
Founder-Centric Economics
- Non-founders (actors, voice actors, specialists) are contractors
- Contractors are paid per project
- Contractors do not take equity
- All contractor costs are treated as expenses
-
Output Targets
- A rough planning goal of multiple movies per year
- Enough volume to:
- Improve quality over time
- Build audience momentum
- Create compounding revenue
-
Community Benchmarking
- Filmmakers are compared in quartiles:
- Top quartile
- Above average
- Below average
- Bottom quartile
- Filmmakers are compared in quartiles:
The intent is not competition for its own sake.
It is to expose bottlenecks and accelerate learning through peer comparison.
Production Model
Contractors and Parallelized Production
ACT 3 is designed around asynchronous, parallelized collaboration.
Key ideas:
-
Filmmakers can hire:
- Actors
- Voice actors
- Colorists
- Audio experts
- VFX specialists
-
Contributors:
- Work remotely
- Operate on flexible schedules
- Submit work shot-by-shot
- Can be swapped mid-project if quality is insufficient
-
Production parallelization reduces:
- Risk
- Schedule fragility
- Production bottlenecks
This structure minimizes coordination overhead and single points of failure.
Acting into AI Film
ACT 3 uses a hybrid acting model.
- The script generates the first version of the movie
- Dialogue forms the backbone of scenes
- AI generates initial acting and visual motion
- Filmmakers review the movie early, even at partial script completion
Once the script is locked:
- Filmmakers mark only the shots that require human acting
- Human acting is applied selectively
- Budget is concentrated where it matters most
This preserves creative quality while controlling cost and accelerating production.
Voice Acting
Voice acting follows the same principles as acting.
Key elements:
- Voice actors work asynchronously
- High-quality microphones and quiet environments are required
- Voice actors can be replaced mid-project if quality is insufficient
Additional flexibility:
- Voice translation enables consistency across actors
- Recording can be parallelized
- Dependence on any single voice actor is reduced
Per-Movie Economics and Market Segments
ACT 3 prioritizes niche-first filmmaking.
Rationale:
- Big-budget studios ignore small niches
- Small niches can still be highly profitable
- Niche audiences:
- Are easier to reach
- Are more loyal
- Often have higher willingness to pay
Examples include:
- Military veterans creating military-themed films
- Nurses creating hospital dramas
- Law enforcement professionals creating crime stories
ACT 3 emphasizes matching creator life experience to subject matter.
Monetization: PPV, Subscriptions, and ACT 3 TV
ACT 3 challenges traditional film economics.
Key observations:
- Traditional distribution captures most revenue
- Indie filmmakers receive a small fraction of total value
ACT 3 prioritizes:
- Pay-Per-View (PPV) as the initial monetization model
- Subscriptions after PPV viability is established
- ACT 3 TV as a creator-first distribution platform
The economic goal is to keep the mass majority of viewer payments with filmmakers.
Per-Year Economics
ACT 3 frames success in yearly terms.
Target range:
- $200k–$400k per founder per year
- Net profit
- After expenses
- After marketing
- After distribution
Core metrics include:
- Movies produced per year
- Profit per movie (first 12 months)
- Ongoing revenue from older releases
Performance is compared through community benchmarking and peer learning.
Marketing Strategy
ACT 3 prioritizes speed to profitability over theatrical scale.
Key channels:
- Short-form social video
- Advertising networks
Guideline effort allocation:
- 25–50%: Script writing or script buying
- ~20%: Film production
- 25–50%: Marketing
- ~5%: Learning
Distribution is intentionally minimized to preserve revenue and enable rapid iteration.
Legacy Filmmaking, Elevated to AI
ACT 3 reframes traditional filmmaking workflows by removing structural inefficiencies.
The goal is to reduce time spent on:
- Fundraising
- Distribution negotiations
- Legal overhead
- Networking
- Waiting between projects
While preserving what matters: storytelling quality and creative control.
Indie AI Filmmakers’ Unique Unfair Advantage
Sources of advantage include:
- Geographic uniqueness
- Career experience
- Personal insight into specific life stages
- Specialized knowledge
AI amplification enables access to visuals, locations, and production speed that traditional filmmaking cannot afford.
Barbell Content Strategy (High-Level)
ACT 3 references a Barbell Content Strategy:
- Short-form content for reach and discovery
- Long-form content for monetization and depth
This section remains intentionally high-level.
Community-Driven Growth
ACT 3 is designed as:
- A filmmaking platform
- A creator community
- A distribution network
Community functions include peer benchmarking, feedback loops, and shared learning that compound performance over time.
Closing Perspective
ACT 3 exists to make independent AI filmmaking a real career path, not a hobby.
This is not about replacing Hollywood.
It is about creating a parallel economic system where creators own their IP, control their revenue, and build long-term sustainability.
End of Hollywood Whitepaper.